April 13, 2004
Media hysteria Pt. 2
More gloating and lecturing from the luxurious and safe Parisian offices of the French media.
They're getting so excited and lost in their delirium crisis that soon enough they'll need to be put at the very least on Prozac and will ask for a sick leave. And again it will be Bush's fault. The collapse of the French social security: Bush's fault too!
When I say 'do not forgive, do not forget', I mean it.
Emphasis is mine.
French press writes off allied control of IraqPosted by Carine at April 13, 2004 07:01 PM
PARIS, April 12 (AFP) - French media took a sharp swipe Monday at US President George W. Bush's policy in Iraq, where US troops are struggling to regain control over several cities that have become flashpoints of insurgency.
Newspapers presented the violent opposition to the US-led occupation as a failure of Bush's attempt to reshape the Middle East by force, and warned of chaos if Washington does not reach out soon to the United Nations for help.
They also expressed concern over the abduction of foreign civilians by Iraqi insurgents and the potential for regional instability.
The left-leaning Liberation said the Americans were in "dire straits".
Bush was seeing his support at home plummet, it noted, adding: "Each worsening of the situation only underlines the mediocrity of that figure (Bush), as well as the haphazard character of his strategic choices."
Bush's "incompetence" was weakening the governments of other countries that followed him into Iraq, it said, asking how they were now evaluating the transformation of their "war of liberation" into the "dirty war that seems to be looming with its hostage-taking and the photos of dead children?"
The United Nations now seemed the only option "to offer a reasonable exit from the current crisis," it said, adding that time for Bush and his top ally Prime Minister Tony Blair of Britain was running out.
Another daily, Le Parisien, said the situation had clearly changed from post-war reconstruction to all-out conflict.
"The Americans don't dare use the word... but it's well and truly a new war which has started," it said.
The tone of the coverage in the newspapers and other outlets bordered on we-told-you-so, and recalled the hostility between Paris and Washington that occurred just over a year ago when France led an international grouping that ultimately blocked US hopes of winning a UN mandate for the invasion.
"In 12 months, the Americans and their allies have accumulated military and political errors," Le Parisien said.
The 135,000 US soldiers involved in the occupation are now hopelessly outnumbered by the combined numbers of Shiite and Sunni Muslim Iraqis opposed to their presence, and the "coalition of the willing" is crumbling, the newspaper said.
"Only Tony Blair is remaining faithful to his ally. The Spanish are about to leave. What are the Japanese going to do? The Italians are divided on the issue. In Poland, a serious domestic political crisis is brewing...."If the Americans leave, today or June 30 (the date for a scheduled handover of powers to an interim Iraqi administration), there will be chaos, maybe even civil war," it said.
Le Figaro, a conservative newspaper sympathetic to French President Jacques Chirac's government, largely limited itself to factual reporting of a shaky truce in one of Iraq's rebellious cities, Fallujah, the shooting down of a US helicopter and the kidnapping of several foreigners.
But its correspondent in Baghdad, Georges Malbrunot, wrote that Iraq's Sunnis and Shiites were increasingly setting aside their own differences to confront the US troops.
The Americans, who he said had been pursuing a policy of dividing the two confessions to better control the country, "are now going to have to revise their strategy. To avert the nightmare of a hasty departure."
Well, you got to wonder what the French Press of today would say if they were on Omaha Beach on June 6, 1944. They probably would have called FDR and Churchill ignorant and would have wanted to negotiate a cease-fire with Hitler!
I love what Tony Blair said: “The truth is, faced with this struggle, on which our own fate hangs, a significant part of Western opinion ([my addition]FRANCE!) is sitting back, if not half-hoping we fail, certainly replete with schadenfreude at the difficulty we find.”
But when it comes down to it, the French do not really matter what happens in Iraq. They are, at this point, a non-entity. The only thing that can really keep the US soldiers and Marines from winning in Iraq is the American people. The support must stay strong here in the US. Nothing else really matters. If the support here fails, as the Democrats wish, it will be over in Iraq. But, Carnie, WE sure do appreciate your support!!!!
Posted by: andy at April 14, 2004 01:03 AMTwenty Marines died in or around Falusha last week. A thousand of Saddam's dead enders were KIA or wounded. Thousand to twenty ratio. We have 200,000 soldiers in Iraq, give or take ten thousand. At the rate it is going, I'm betting they will run out of Jihadis first.
Carine, you should have your own newspaper. There is simply no substitute for truth. It is the ultimate sales gimick.
Posted by: Papertiger at April 14, 2004 01:47 PMhere is a snippet from the front lines of Fallujah
regarding the fighting spirit of our Marines.
who do you think is going to win this war?
Thanks for the link.
Posted by: Carine at April 15, 2004 11:51 PM




