May 28, 2004
Colombani: Dear readers, you just don't get it, I am not anti-American
Following Jean-Marie Colombani's May 15 anti-American (tout à fait, de "l'anti-américanisme primaire" M. Colombani) editorial in Le Monde, I wrote him a **nice** letter, letting him know what I thought about his so-called editorial.
Believe it or not, apparently, I wasn't the only one complaining about his anti-American bias. He has written and sent a circular letter, a Word file titled "américains" (no capital letter) to answer.
Here is the translation.
Please keep any beverage away from your computer.
Paris,
May 26, 2004
Dear Madam,
Dear Sir,
Dear readers,
A lot of you have reacted towards my editorial "Tous non-Américains ?" published in Le Monde on May 15.
Some of you thought what I wrote was "primitive anti-Americanism". That wasn't my intention at all! What Le Monde has been constantly denouncing, and [the matter] upon which I insist in this article, is the voluntary confusion that George Bush has made between the invasion of Irak and the war on terror. After refusing the intervention of the UN, he's now looking desperately for its help. It was dangerous and it is detrimental to have intervened without the endorsement of the UN, as we never ceased, again, to advocate. Actually, I am fundamentally reproaching him for having contributed to part Europe from the United States in a time in History when solidarity in front of terrorism should prevail.
As Henri Martre writes in our columns (Le Monde, May 27), "it is evident that in a few decades, the United States will be less and less capable of bearing the burden of the governing of the world and it is in its upmost interest to encourage more subtle equilibriums in which Europe has to play its role".
Thank you for taking the time to write to us. Sincerely,
Jean-Marie Colombani
I won't insist on the fallacy of President Bush "refusing the intervention of the UN". Colombani's letter is so blatantly hypocritical that it becomes contemptuous of Le Monde's readers.
It isn't clear in his letter whether the "we" that "never ceased to advocate" an endorsement of the UN is representing France or Le Monde and its gang of pseudo-journalists.
Notice that Mr. Colombani isn't even apologizing for causing, at the very least, confusion. No. The several readers who complained simply didn't understand Mr. Colombani was just anti-Bush. Not anti-American.
Unfortunate, stupid readers of Le Monde. They are not in the same league as the newspaper and its journalists. Their view is probably a little too simplistic for Mr. Colombani's outbursts of hateful logorrhea.
Click 'continue reading' to read the original letter in French.
The original letter:
Paris,Posted by Carine at May 28, 2004 01:36 AM
Le 26 mai 2004
Madame et chère lectrice,
Monsieur et cher lecteur,
Vous avez été nombreuses et nombreux à réagir à mon éditorial « Tous non-Américains ?» paru dans Le Monde du 15 mai.
Certaines ou certains d’entre vous ont pensé que je faisais de « l’anti-américanisme primaire ». Tel (sic) n’était pas du tout mon intention ! Ce que Le Monde dénonce avec constance, et sur lequel j’insiste dans cet article, c’est l’amalgame que George Bush a fait entre l’invasion de l’Irak et la lutte contre le terrorisme. Après avoir refusé l’intervention de l’ONU, il cherche aujourd’hui désespérément son aide. Il était dangereux et il est dommageable d’être intervenu en Irak sans l’aval de l’ONU comme nous n’avons cessé là encore de le préconiser. Au fond, je lui reproche fondamentalement d’avoir contribué à éloigner l’Europe des Etats-Unis à un moment de l’Histoire où la solidarité face au terrorisme devrait prévaloir.
Comme l’écrit Henri Martre dans nos colonnes (Le Monde du 27 mai), « il est clair qu’à l’horizon de quelques dizaines d’années, les Etats-Unis seront de moins en moins capables de porter le fardeau de la gouvernance du monde et qu’ils ont intérêt à favoriser des équilibres plus subtils où l’Europe doit tenir sa place ».
En vous remerciant d’avoir pris la peine de nous écrire, je vous prie de croire, Madame et chère lectrice, Monsieur et cher lecteur, à l’assurance de mes sentiments les meilleurs.
Jean-Marie Colombani
May I be the first to wish Couillon-bani a lot of fun in Parislamabad if ever Martre's fantasy about the US being unable to 'govern' the world were to become reality. There will be no Charles Martel to stop the invasion this time around, which, btw, has already started.
Jean-Marie will of course have to become Mohammed and he'll be obliged to re-work the 'We are all Americans' bit into 'We all praise Allah', but, hey, who cares... Not I. He is just too weasel-ly...and beyond help.
Posted by: Valerie at May 28, 2004 01:13 AMThis is just too rich:
After refusing the intervention of the UN, [GWB is] now looking desperately for its help.
M. Colombani has "voluntarily confused" France's whinging, foot-stamping, and teary, shameless, desperate pleading that the UN -- France's only egress to Iraq -- be put in charge of the coalition's success with his personal wish-fantasy of a bumbling confused GWB.
Pfft.
As for separating Europe from America, M. Colombani of course can only see this:
A) as a one-way split with American -- not French -- adamancy solely to blame. There is enough established evidence that the make-or-break UN endorsement is nothing but a French fairy tale, repeated over and over in an attempt to erase its botched status quo gamble.
B) as France and her little club of Old Zeropean chums as being the whole of Europe. This is so much "make it so" French propaganda, "comme nous n’avons cessé là encore de le préconiser".
The premise of Henri Martre's "burden of world governing" remark is that this burden now squarely rests with America. Such outrecuidance -- "the burden of governing the world" -- is a wholly and typically French idea, not American. America leads because it is obliged; it has no French ambitions to govern the world. But let us concede for a moment M. Martre's presumption. If a future America will be less capable of governing the great big world, then why would it allow France to slip a ring through its nose to hasten the day? Wouldn't the prudent course be to press urgently its advantage of governing to shape a settled, peaceable future world, not hesitate by waiting for the dithering faint of heart, straddlers, and kibitzers to come around?
Messrs. Colombani and Martre have put forward here a mix of rump notions, half-ideas, and wishful hash based on little more than their unshakable conceit, representing France, and France's international penis envy, representing the authors.
DGB
Posted by: Damian Bennett at May 28, 2004 05:13 PMAye, it's as if he doesn't realize who he's writing to - the people who don't already share his premises.
Posted by: Doug at May 28, 2004 07:46 PMRest assured I sent an answer to Colombani. But I think he's a hopeless case.
Posted by: Carine at May 29, 2004 09:11 AMNo one likes us, I don't know why.
We might not be perfect, but heaven knows we try.
All around, even our old friends put us down.
Lets drop the big one and see what happens.
We give them money-but are they grateful?
No, they're spiteful and they're hateful
They don't respect us-so let's surprise them
We'll drop the big one and pulverize them.
Asia's crowded and Europe's too old
Africa is far too hot
And Canada's too cold
And South America stole our name
Let's drop the big one
There'll be no one left to blame us
We'll save Australia
Don't wanna hurt no kangaroo
We'll build an All American amusement park there
They got surfin', too
Boom goes London and boom Paree
More room for you and more room for me
And every city the whole world round
Will just be another American town
Oh, how peaceful it will be
We'll set everybody free
You'll wear a Japanese kimono
And there'll be Italian shoes for me
They all hate us anyhow
So let's drop the big one now
Let's drop the big one now
Political Science by Randy Newman
Don't know that it perticularly applies to this post. I bet Columbani has the CD.
Posted by: papertiger at June 4, 2004 10:15 AM




