October 02, 2004
Is that why she was freed?
I'm sorry to have to ask this question, but this is sickening.
And I don't want to hear about the Stockholm Syndrome. I would just want to know whether Ms. Simona Torretta was having a thought for the beheaded victims of the "resistance" or for the Iraqi children killed by "rebels" attacks. She is alive. Some are not anymore.
Posted by Carine at October 2, 2004 06:14 PMWhat a moronic tool. Oh well, since she promised, at least we can take comfort in the fact that she won`t be back in Iraq anytime soon.
Posted by: Joatmoaf at October 2, 2004 10:35 PMSounds like a committed terrorist groupie.
Posted by: papertiger at October 3, 2004 04:54 AMHer comments are exactly like everyone else in the press among the appeasers. Why the suprise?
I thought an actual hostage would have at least been a little more careful about what she would say. Especially since she's alive and some are not.
On one hand she says she's against kidnappings of civilians, but on the other hand, by condoning what she calls the "resistance," she's encouraging them to continue. She tells it herself, they're "justified." So why is she happy to have been freed?
Posted by: Carine at October 3, 2004 12:29 PMSurely, it's not the Stockholm Syndrome. She is a radical anti-war activist, her speech didn't me surprise.
She supports the so-called "resistants" and she is against the "kidnapping of civilians" ( but not the coalition soldiers). But the fact is that her "resistants" kidnap the civilians.If she thinks " in the end they were convinced that we were not enemies." .
Please came back in Iraq and work with her friends. And good riddance!
