October 03, 2004
The France-Iraq-Saddam friendship group
Still no credible news regarding the French hostages. On the other hand, the last part of the rocambolesque story of their release turns out to be more interesting than we could have thought.
As one of Valerie's links pointed out, Didier Julia, a French UMP (Chirac's party) MP, is vice-president of the French-Iraqi parliamentary friendship group, a group that already existed under Saddam and that was allegedly a recipient of Saddam's oil vouchers.
And indeed, Mr. Julia is no stranger to Saddam's Iraq. In September 2002, he was one of the three French MPs who went to Baghdad to try and make Saddam change his mind, not to mention save him. At least 2 of them, including Julia, went back to Iraq again in February 2003, just weeks before the beginning of the war, for "cultural reasons" according to Julia. He was of course against the war and signed a petition asking for the liberation of Tariq Aziz. In an article explaining his Sept. 02 trip to Iraq, Julia seems to imply the three men were more than welcome in Iraq, yet talked to their hosts in a "manly way":
Since we were coming on our own initiative, we talked with our heart and told them: "We think you are in a totalitarian regime that we do not approve. But we care about the Iraqi people, and this old babylonian civilization. But Americans want to destroy you to take your oil."
Amazing when in the same article, Julia explains that they went to Iraq thanks to a French consortium, the OFDIC (French Office for the Development of Industry and Culture), that has been working with Iraq for years and "realize[d] not less than a 3.5 trillion francs turnover a year with Iraq." Saddam's Iraq.
And as far as oil is concerned... well, time will tell. We already mentioned the Al-Mada list.
And who is the president of the OFDIC? A certain... Philippe Brett, the man who pretended less than a week ago that he had talked to the French hostages and was going to bring them back. A man also described as "sent to Iraq by 'a Libanese-Syrian business man named Moustapha Aziz, weapons dealer and recently a supplier to Ivory Coast's armies.'"
Europolitica has a very detailed article, based partly on an article by French news magazine L'Express, about Saddam's French network of relations. Below are excerpts I found particularly interesting in regard to the current situation.
And then, of course, there is Jany Le Pen [Le Pen's wife] and... quoted by Christian Chesnot and Georges Malbrunot [our two hostages] in "Les Années Saddam" [Saddam's years], the president of the Front National "was important in this network of political-industrial interests." That's because our two journalists hostages have been there for years and in the know concerning many troubled affairs in the middle east.And this is precisely those two journalists who tell in their book [Saddam Hussein : Portrait total?] how "one day in November 2000, a Falcon 900 landed at Baghdad airport, reduced to idleness by the air blockade. On board, the creme de la creme of SOS-Enfants d'Irak, including Sixte-Henri de Bourbon-Parme, brother of a pretender to the throne of Spain. . . .
Actually, in Iraq, Le Pen was looking less for money than for a world echo. And he sometimes found it, even if the price was a part of his electorate. His first meeting with Saddam Hussein . . . allowed him, in November 1990, to come back to France with 55 French hostages. A second meeting, six years later, will give [Le Pen] the occasion to denounce the "collective genocide" . . . created by the embargo. "Saddam and Le Pen had both in common an aversion to Jews and hostility towards America," Saman Abdul Majid, the official translator who was there during both meetings, remembers. . . .
Pleading in favor of Baghdad was like failing the imperialism of the United States. "Iraq was supporting Roselyne Bachelot in 1996, then at the head of the France-Iraq friendship group at the parliament, that is a rampart," reminds L'Express.
Seduced by the (illusory) perspectives of the lifting of the UN sanctions, Saddam's era courtesans were sometimes within the limits of greed and ideology . . . . President of the French Office for the Development of Industry and Culture (OFDIC), Philippe Brett was there too. The same Brett who is acting today with Julia.
Philippe Brett was a founding member of the French Office for the Development of Industry and Culture (OFDIC), organization that militated for the lifting of the embargo imposed on Iraq after the invasion of Koweit. In September 2002, while the American intervention was taking shape, it had chartered a plane to carry three members of the French parliament to Baghdad, Thierry Mariani, Eric Diard and Didier Julia. Close to the far-right according to Le Monde, Philippe Brett would have been the driver and bodyguard of Bruno Gollnisch, [Le Pen's] Front National's #2.
As for Didier Julia, 70, UMP member of the Parliament for 37 years, he has always been close to Baghdad's former regime. Unknown from the public at large, he's "on national television" after his trip to Baghdad at the head of the team of "pieds nickelés" who started, just before the lethal meetings of the UNSC, some kind of "saddam rescue" operation as ridicule as vain.
To be continued...
UPDATE: French Media in disarray. Who did what? (Emphasis mine)
French media, many of which have been publishing a daily vigil for the hostage journalists, were scathing of Julia's supposed operation - but also at the seeming "impotence" of the government.Posted by Carine at October 3, 2004 06:13 PMThey additionally highlighted curious developments that suggested Julia may have had a measure of official support.
Chief among those was the reported involvement of Laurent Gbagbo, the president of the former French colony of Ivory Coast.
Gbagbo's plane was used to transport Julia to Baghdad on September 5, Le Monde reported. Another newspaper, Le Telegramme de Brest, said the plane was again used to fly a Moroccan man carrying a ransom to Amman.
Le Monde said, according to undisclosed sources in Paris, Brett had been a go-between for arms shipments to Ivory Coast, where a civil war broke out two years ago.
It also reported that France's ambassador to Syria, Jean-Francois Girault, held a long meeting with Julia early Friday, before the deputy affirmed that the hostages would soon be freed.
Le Journal du Dimanche speculated that Julia had been manipulated by the Syrian intelligence services as part of a plot by Damascus to punish France for backing a UN resolution condemning Syrian involvement in Lebanon.
Carine this post is a blockbuster.
The main swindler in UNSCAM is the guy the French sent to extract their journalists? I can't even begin to point out how wrong this is on all levels.
Amazing jounalism on your part!
Posted by: papertiger at October 3, 2004 09:40 PMPT,
We don't know exactly whether Julia and Brett went to Iraq with an official green light or not. The government is denying any knowledge of what they call the "private" initiative. But if Julia really used Gbagbo's plane, it would be surprising, if not worrying, that the government didn't know.
Of course, you'd expect Julia to resign, but that just won't happen.
What is more troubling and would deserve investigation, imho, is what the two journalists wrote and possibly denounced in their book exactly.
Posted by: Carine at October 4, 2004 09:42 AMThat is a dilema. Choice between the nutjobs who want to cut your head off, or the crook with high up ties in the Government, who you just exposed.
Christian Chesnot and Georges Malbrunot are screwed, pretty much I think. Unless I'm not understanding this correctly.
Still what a story! This is a classic in the Alexandre Dumas tradition.
You figure the Iraqi terrorist nutjobs and Didier are in collusion still?
What does the French press think?
The French public?
Right now, the French press is saying it may have been just for the show. Apparently, Brett was not even in Iraq when he or Julia claimed he was with the two hostages. Apparently, all along, he stayed in Damas. Although he was in Iraq the weeks before.
The whole story is just strange, and confusing. Very French actually. It reminds me a bit of the Big Wolf story. We don't know much, it's so incoherent the situation sounds absolutely stupid and we probably never know what really happened.
Posted by: Carine at October 4, 2004 10:23 PMI'm taking the news just now. Apparently, according to Le Monde, the government knew from the beginning. It is very confused actually.
Also, the Ivorian press doesn't seem too happy with Gbagbo's plane being used. I had a look at several local newspapers online. Some wonder why he tried to "help" France, some hint to the fact that one French journalist recently died in Ivory Coast, another one is missing, so maybe Gbagbo wanted to help bring back the other two. One article was writing about the incompetence of the French government. Another one says Gbagbo "invited himself to the French sh*t that is the French hostage crisis." Yet another one is saying that Gbagbo is cleaning Chirac's trash.
And again, France is an international laughing stock.
Posted by: Carine at October 5, 2004 12:24 AMI hope that American or Iraqi forces bring those two out alive. That might be their only hope. Plus it makes for a happy ending , which Chirac will have to grin through clenched teeth about.
Posted by: papertiger at October 5, 2004 01:07 AMI agree. Just beware what could come out of this situation. French journalists have a LOT of imagination, especially as far as the US is concerned.
Posted by: Carine at October 5, 2004 10:13 AM You can not count on the US extending themselves to recover or retain any of these pitiful journo hacks, why would they be interested? Thes two little frech priks set themselves up to be captured. In due time- it will also be proven that the two Italian imbeciles coordinated their "kidnapping" with a group of bearded idiots simply to finance them against the US with a 1 million ransom culled from cowardness.
In fact, if these two fools show themselves in public I would immediately wrap a pair of Lyndie England's desert-worn panties across their cowardly faces and beat them upside the head with a dusty sandal.
I certainly don't expect US or coalition forces to look for the French journalists and get into harm's way for two French citizens. Indeed, that's not their job, but if they happened to, say, find them by chance and bring them back, I think the face of Chirac hearing the news would be priceless.
Posted by: Carine at October 5, 2004 10:05 PMAnd again, France is an international laughing stock.
Again? I would expect a lull in the din of laughter before you could claim one instance was separate from another.
Posted by: Doug at October 6, 2004 09:21 PMI guess you're right. I should have used "still" and not "again."
Yet you have to admit this one is of particular intensity. And duration.
Posted by: Carine at October 6, 2004 11:56 PM



