September 16, 2005
NYC Letter: Irish Horse Hockey
EU AMBASSADOR FINDS THE POSITIVE IN KATRINA
BRUXELLES September 15, 2005 (IHT) - While the United States hesitated about whether to accept aid, it eventually decided to take it. "That is an important step in normalization," John Bruton, a former Irish prime minister, said Wednesday. "They are a big country, but they are another country just like anyone else." Realizing that made the disaster "a salutary learning experience for the U.S.," he said.
Think about Mr. Bruton's condescending blarney for a moment.
"Normalization" in the context of his remarks is diplo-speak for the rehabilitation of a wayward nation, here, the United States, to the proprieties of a community of nations, here, the EU. How disappointing for Mr. Bruton when he discovers America takes a pass on "normalizing" itself to contemporary EU norms. Mr. Bruton will also be disappointed to learn that America is not just big, which he seems to have grasped, but it is a nation unlike any other, a concept inimical to self-important bit players.
We find nothing geopolitically "salutary" about Katrina, notwithstanding Mr. Bruton's aggrandisement of Europa's modest and -- no offense -- incidental response.
Could America have managed nicely without European tents, camp beds, pumps, and generators? The correct answer is yes, very nicely. Mr. Bruton's politically correct answer is NO, of course not. We salute the genuine concern and efforts of individual Europeans, but the truth is Europa as a political entity is not prepared to give much, certainly not to the point of straining the public weal or enduring the pains of sacrifce. Europa gives what it won't much miss. And as regards America, what little Europa spares it spares with out-sized self-importance. Look, look, America! A boat-load of blankets and tea cosies! Consider it our Marshall Plan to you.
In his first 10 months as ambassador, Bruton said, it had become clear that the United States behaved like a 19th-century sovereign state for which multilateralism was "an important tool, but only one of a number of tools," in contrast to EU countries that rarely acted without consultation with their neighbors.
Leave it to an EU functionary to give "sovereign state" a prejorative taint. The distinction Mr. Bruton draws explains much of why America does much and Europa does little, why what America does moves the world and what Europa manages barely ripples. Mr. Bruton's remark is all the more ironic as bickering "multilateral" EU gropes its way toward a future located somewhere in the 19th century.
Before Mr. Bruton gives any more little talks extolling Katrina as a welcome felling of American greatness, he would do well to take the proper measure of do-little nombriliste Europa.
It shames us that a member of our bloodroot should talk so stupidly.
Posted by Damian at September 16, 2005 10:15 PMWell written article that about sums up my feelings about mulitlaterialism and europe( the small e is on purpose).
This bureauocrat's lecture will play well with the BBC crowd. But help me out, when was the last time Ireland came to the aid of anyone except the Irish? And sending bottled water is not the kind of aid I am talking about.
Mike, "when was the last time Ireland came to the aid of anyone except the Irish? And sending bottled water is not the kind of aid I am talking about."
It isn't what is given but the spirit in which the gift is given that matters. A group of Iraqis gave a little over $750 US to a US general for the Katrina victims. It wasn't much, but it was all they could give with families to support in the Iraqi situation. It reminded me of the parable of the wealthy man who gave a percentage of his income to a temple and a poor widow who gave a single "insignificant" coin. The donation was nothing to the wealthy man, but the widow gave all she had.
While I have no doubts about the integrity of individual Europeans who have donated to the Red Cross and other civilian agencies, I DO have some doubts of the motivations of certain governments. Maybe they want to help, or maybe they're after brownie points. We may never know.
Posted by: mamapajamas at September 18, 2005 09:08 PMIt's the thought that counts - in the case of government aid, there may be good reason to question the thought. In the case of some ordinary Iraqi soldiers I don't see any need to question it at all.
Posted by: Jay at September 19, 2005 02:05 AM"a 19th-century sovereign state"
Eurocentrism at it's finest. He clearly refers to 19th century european states, but omits the qualifier as though european were the only kind.
Posted by: Doug at September 19, 2005 11:29 AM




