November 14, 2005

Is France ready for hardline socialism?

While the number of communist regimes around the world tends to decrease due to the obvious failure and murderous character of all communist regimes, France seems to be pleasantly slipping toward communism. Not only the far-left is more and more popular (wait for the next elections to have an idea just how popular it is here), free trade is seen as the danger in the world, individual freedom as dangerously selfish, and don't even get me started on religion and religious freedom.

For example, monthly Enjeux Les Echos has published a special issue on economic liberalism (European meaning of the word, i.e. mostly the theory that fosters free trade, little state intervention and laissez-faire capitalism): "Liberalism - Why it's scaring people. Is it the solution to our problems?" A wolf is on the cover of the special issue that reads, Le Libéralisme.

liberalism_wolf.jpg

The calls to a revolution are many, especially, of course, among the several - and God knows we have lots of them - far-left movements. Here is what I have seen today not far from La Sorbonne:

Place St-Michel, Paris - November 14, 2005


French Maoist Communist Party - In every neighborhood! - Let's prepare the alternative for the proletarian revolution! - Let's form popular committees!





We are right to revolt (Mao Zedong) - Read the Red Flag

I ran into this article a couple of days ago: Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian. The point of the article is mainly to demonstrate the illustration that goes with it, that is:

nazi-com.jpg

Interestingly, I saw this article just a few days after seeing pictures of the celebrations of the anniversary of the 1917 Russian revolution in Moscow:

Rev_1917_2005.jpg

What I'm wondering is which totalitarianism the French will choose (for chances are that we're heading toward one of them)? Someone recently told me (again) regarding the 2002 presidential election: "Le Pen - Chirac, what kind of a choice is that?" What if 2007 is worse? How about a so-called far-right vs. far-left second round? Le Pen claims the recent riots brought his party thousands of new recruits. As I've mentioned, the far-left is popular beyond reason here. And of course, there is the islamofascist threat that most French prefer to stay blind to.
What kind of a choice would be José Bové or Olivier Besancenot against Jean-Marie Le Pen?

Posted by Carine at November 14, 2005 03:00 PM
Comments

I think France is going to die and that's it. Welcome to the islamic republic of Merdistan.

Posted by: Duff at November 14, 2005 05:59 PM

Nothing to say...

Appart from the last picture. It seems that photoshop can do really good things...
Moreover there aren't such flags on the other pictures.

Finally : if you analyse the details of the picture (because a normal eye can easily notice it), it's completely fake.

Posted by: Stéphane at November 15, 2005 12:28 AM

Stéphane, smartass, it's an AP picture! It's not mine, it's Associated Press. You know what Associated Press is, right?

You can deny as much as you want, this picture is real, taken in Moscow on Red Square. Please also notice the islamofascist terrorist recognition sign: the keffieh.

Three totalitarianisms in one. Three socialisms.

Of course, if you had only read (and understood) the article I linked to, and knew anything about nazism, communism and the USSR, you wouldn't ridicule yourself that way.

Posted by: Carine at November 15, 2005 08:14 AM

And here it is again.

A member of the National Bolshevik Party gestures during a rally to commemorate the Bolshevik Revolution, marking a long-sacred former holiday that was an official working day for the first time in decades in Moscow, Monday, Nov. 7, 2005.
Posted by: Carine at November 15, 2005 08:30 AM

And another one.

The leader of the National Bolshevik Party Eduard Limonov attends a demonstration marking Revolution Day in Moscow November 7, 2005.
Posted by: Carine at November 15, 2005 08:34 AM

Actually, about "Enjeux les Echos", november 2005: the editorial's title is «The country that didn't want to change», and it sets the tone: «Rather dead than liberals. Rather dead than bowing down before those countries that managed to cure the evils we're suffering from. Rather dead than surrendering to common sense...»

Posted by: Maryse at November 16, 2005 01:47 PM

Very good article as usual. Just to be fair with Enjeux les Echos:
This is the best paper on Free trade Market I've read and worth reading one.
But you're right, for the cover, they're using a hat trick:
Most of the french have this picture of liberalism in head. So, it's simply a marketing way to sell more magazines.
The problem is:
People who have a priori on free-trade market will buy and will see that it's not so bad.
People who think bad and who don't buy the magazine will go on thinking bad.
> Maryse: For the sentence that you states, the writer who is a pro-free-trade thinker, is just repeating what most french are thinking to criticize it.
For communism, I'll add that the worse is not said here: right now, you can't watch a TV show without listening to a communist thinker. They're invited on each political program. It's incredible, when you think their bad results on the last poll! So you see they're alive and kicking. For myself, I wonder how deep was KGB and french officials mixed together?
I've just add on my blog a russian dissident's text on post-communism.
http://mon-candidat-liberal-tusk.neufblog.com/moncandidatliberaltusk/
I think that every french pro-trade thinker could consider himself as a dissident. We're standing on an island of in the middle of crazy people. The only difference with USSR: the quantity and the quality of food. They say you can't think when you're hungry. Here it's the very contrary: you can't think when the only thing you've got in mind is what you're going to eat.

Posted by: Jean-Paul at November 16, 2005 03:37 PM

Nothing new under the sun: "Panem et Circenses"...

Posted by: Maryse at November 16, 2005 04:37 PM

Jean-Paul, Maryse,

Have you read this special issue of Enjeux Les Echos? I was wondering if it was worth buying.

I don't really blame them for using a wolf to describe how "le libéralisme" is seen in France. That's precisely how most people see it. But I'd like to know if they agree with that vision or if they defend liberalism in their pages.

Posted by: Carine at November 17, 2005 11:30 AM

It's realy worth buying. It's a well writen and very objective. It is not treating free trade market as an ideology, but as a doctrine( as it should be). It analyses the pro and the contra. The people of Enjeux les Echos can be heard also on a very good podcast, on the radio BFM, which is named good morning w.e.
www.radiobfm.com/index.php?id=pagesearch&tx_radio_pi9[emission]=40
I advice you the two last one (pay attention it's also mixed with the bolcho team of Courier International, which I don't advice you).
For the cover, myself I've been writing a book (to come) on GMO, and of course I'll use Greenpeace and Bové, since I criticize them. But I want to sell my book, and I'm not going to show the portrait of Shapiro. CQFD. That's the problem of democratie. Isn't it?
But you're right: french have serious mental illness with their supporting of comies and their hate of liberalism

Posted by: jean-Paul at November 17, 2005 01:35 PM

Thanks, Jean-Paul.

Posted by: Carine at November 18, 2005 08:17 AM

LMAO@"Merdistan"!

France will not choose any prior totalitarianism; it will evolve into a uniquely French one.

That's not precisely a keffiyeh, btw. But you probably know...

Posted by: Doug at November 19, 2005 06:24 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?